In 2026, when doing web scrapping with Playwright, basic stealth plugins like playwright-stealth are often not enough against advanced anti-bot systems (Cloudflare Turnstile, DataDome, PerimeterX, Akamai). This pushes many Python developers toward stronger solutions: Rebrowser Playwright and Camoufox.
Both tools aim to make Playwright automation nearly undetectable — but they use very different approaches. This 2026 comparison shows which one is better for your web scrapping project.
Quick Comparison Table – Rebrowser vs Camoufox (March 2026)
| Aspect | Rebrowser Playwright | Camoufox | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Browser Engine | Chromium (patched Playwright) | Firefox (custom C++ build) | — |
| Detection Evasion Level | Very good (JS + runtime patches) | Excellent (C++ engine-level spoofing) | Camoufox |
| Cloudflare / Turnstile Bypass | ~90–95% (with proxy + behavior) | ~80–90% (strong fingerprints) | Rebrowser |
| CreepJS / Bot Test Scores | Usually passes most tests | Often 0–6% detection | Camoufox |
| Bypass Speed | Fast (~15–25 seconds) | Slower (~40–50 seconds) | Rebrowser |
| Headless Support | Excellent (cloud headful emulation) | Good | Rebrowser |
| Python / Playwright Integration | Drop-in replacement | Playwright-style API (Firefox only) | Rebrowser |
| Cost / Openness | Partially open, cloud paid option | Mostly open-source | Camoufox |
| Best For | High-volume, fast scraping | Maximum fingerprint authenticity | Depends |
1. Architecture & How They Hide Detection
- Rebrowser Playwright: patched Chromium version. Uses JavaScript/runtime patches + isolated execution to remove automation signals (
navigator.webdriver, CDP leaks,cdc_variables). Cloud version runs real headful Chrome on consumer hardware — very strong against "headless" checks. - Camoufox: custom Firefox build with C++ engine modifications. Spoofs canvas, WebGL, audio, fonts, hardware at native level — fingerprints are consistent and authentic (not just masked). No CDP exposure (Firefox doesn’t use it) — impossible for sites to detect Playwright via JS inspection.
2. Real-World Bypass Performance (2026 Tests)
- Rebrowser: slightly better consistency against Cloudflare Turnstile and DataDome in recent benchmarks (~90–95% success with residential proxy + human behavior).
- Camoufox: often achieves cleaner scores on CreepJS, Bot.sannysoft.com and fingerprint.com tests (0–6% detection in headless mode). Struggles a bit more with some Turnstile implementations.
3. Speed & Scalability
- Rebrowser is noticeably faster — average bypass time 15–25 seconds on protected sites.
- Camoufox is slower (~40–50 seconds) due to heavier spoofing and Firefox overhead.
4. Ease of Use in Python Projects
- Rebrowser: almost drop-in replacement for normal Playwright code — minimal changes required.
- Camoufox: very similar Playwright-style API, but launches via
Camoufox()instead ofchromium.launch(). Still easy, but Firefox-only.
5. Proxy & Behavior Integration
Both work excellently with residential proxies and human-like behavior simulation (random mouse curves, typing variance, scroll pauses). Rebrowser cloud version often includes built-in proxy handling — advantage for quick scaling.
Recommendation – Which One to Choose in March 2026
- Choose Rebrowser if you need: speed, high volume, easy integration, slightly better Cloudflare consistency
- Choose Camoufox if you need: maximum fingerprint authenticity, cleanest CreepJS scores, open-source preference
Last updated: March 19, 2026 – Both tools evolve quickly. Always test against creepjs.github.io, bot.sannysoft.com and your target sites. Combine with residential proxies, human behavior and rate limiting for best results.
Legal note: Stealth tools increase success rate but do not make prohibited scrapping legal. Respect robots.txt, ToS, data protection laws (GDPR/CCPA) and prefer official APIs when available.